Skip to content
-
Thanks for visiting. If you want more updates, feel free to subscribe. Subscribe Now!
Nuri's Info World

Smart shopping, market analysis, and practical money ideas

Nuri's Info World

Smart shopping, market analysis, and practical money ideas

  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Privacy Policy
  • Breaking News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Shopping Links
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Privacy Policy
  • Breaking News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Shopping Links
Close

Search

  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
Subscribe
Why the KOSPI Plunged: Chips, Foreign Selling, Leverage, and the Outlook - 01-kospi-en-featured
시장동향

Why the KOSPI Plunged: Chips, Foreign Selling, Leverage, and the Outlook

By stanley0216
2026-07-30 5 Min Read
0
Why the KOSPI Plunged: Chips, Foreign Selling, Leverage, and the Outlook
Key questions behind Why the KOSPI Plunged: Chips, Foreign Selling, Leverage, and the Outlook

The KOSPI fell 10.84% on July 28 and another 5.98% on July 29. This was more than ordinary profit-taking. Heavy index concentration in Samsung Electronics and SK hynix collided with large foreign selling, forced reductions in margin and leveraged positions, and pressure from U.S. technology stocks and bond yields.

The July 29 close of 5,663.24 was still 34.39% above the start of the year. The useful question is therefore not whether the entire bull market has ended. It is how far earnings expectations have reset and when price-insensitive forced selling begins to fade.

Key Takeaways

The central cause was simultaneous foreign selling and forced deleveraging in an index dominated by two semiconductor companies.

Item Figure Meaning
July 28 6,023.66 / -10.84% Circuit breakers were triggered as the intraday loss exceeded 11%
July 29 5,663.24 / -5.98% A second steep loss despite a partial recovery from the intraday low
Five sessions -16.69% Momentum and volatility deteriorated together
Year to date +34.39% Part of the earlier annual gain remained after the selloff
Key figures from confirmed closes and official disclosures
Key figures from confirmed closes and official disclosures

Useful near the startDesktop Calculator for Reviewing Market NumbersA practical desk tool for checking index moves, position sizes, and portfolio arithmetic.10750 KRWView calculatorDesktop Calculator for Reviewing Market Numbers

What Changed Between July 28 and July 29?

The first day was the initial shock from the index’s two largest semiconductor stocks. SK hynix fell 14.7% and Samsung Electronics about 13.4% on July 28. Only 36 stocks advanced while 878 declined. Foreign investors sold roughly 5 trillion won net, while retail investors bought about 4 trillion won.

On the second day, lower prices created collateral shortages and tighter risk limits. When bids are thin, margin accounts and leveraged funds cannot choose an ideal exit price. The KOSPI was down more than 12% intraday on July 29 before closing down 5.98%, a pattern consistent with liquidity stress and position liquidation as well as fundamental news.

Source: Reuters – July 28 KOSPI selloff and flows

Why Was the KOSPI Hit So Hard?

First, semiconductor concentration is unusually high. As of July 28, the RISE KOSPI ETF assigned 27.78% to Samsung Electronics and 24.22% to SK hynix. If both stocks fall by double digits, strength in smaller sectors cannot easily stabilize the index.

Second, the advance into the June peak was very fast. The KOSPI reached 9,114.55 as AI-memory growth and a Korea re-rating were priced in aggressively. Elevated expectations make even a modest earnings miss or a new competitive threat capable of triggering a large valuation reset.

Third, the U.S. technology correction and China-related semiconductor reports pushed in the same direction. Questions about AI returns, lower-cost Chinese AI models, and possible progress in lithography and memory lowered the market’s long-term margin assumptions for Korean chipmakers. Commercial viability is not fully proven, but uncertainty alone can matter when valuations are stretched.

Fourth, derivatives and credit flows followed the cash-market decline. Rising volatility and collateral requirements force investors to reduce risk across holdings, often before separating strong companies from weak ones. That mechanism amplified the second day’s decline.

Source: Reuters – leverage and July 29 volatility

Company, macro, and positioning forces behind the decline
Company, macro, and positioning forces behind the decline

Useful midway throughInvestment Notebook for Tracking DecisionsWriting down the thesis, risk limit, and follow-up data can help reduce impulsive decisions in volatile markets.11000 KRWView notebookInvestment Notebook for Tracking Decisions

Does the Selloff Confirm a Recession or Bear Market?

Not yet. The immediate evidence points more strongly to an earnings-expectation reset and a concentrated market structure than to a sudden collapse in Korean exports or aggregate corporate profit. The KOSPI also remained positive for the year as of July 29.

It would be equally risky to dismiss the move as only technical. Deleveraging can persist for several sessions, and sustained high oil prices and long-term yields could eventually weaken earnings outside semiconductors. The key is whether a positioning shock begins to alter fundamentals.

  • Look for broader participation rather than an index-only rebound
  • Check whether foreign cash and futures selling slow together
  • Watch whether Samsung and SK hynix begin making higher intraday lows
  • Prefer closes near the session high on normal or strong turnover

Source: AP – global markets on July 29

Confirmation signals for the bull, base, and bear paths
Confirmation signals for the bull, base, and bear paths

Outlook: A Bounce Is Possible, but a Bottom Needs Confirmation

A technical rebound can occur at any time after losses of this magnitude. Still, one large up day is weaker evidence than two or three sessions of improving foreign flows, semiconductor earnings expectations, and market breadth.

The bullish path requires stabilization in U.S. chip stocks, limited downward revisions for Samsung and SK hynix, and an end to sustained foreign outflows. The base path is an index rebound led by only a few large stocks while volatility remains high. The bearish path develops if oil and yields rise further and forced selling retests the lows.

Source: RISE ETF – KOSPI constituent weights

Three Paths From Here

Path Confirmation
Bull Semiconductor stabilization, foreign buying, and broader participation
Base A reflex rebound with persistent volatility and megacap concentration
Bear Higher oil and yields extend deleveraging and force a retest

What to Monitor

Indicator What it shows
Foreign cash and futures flows Whether selling slows in both markets
Samsung and SK hynix Whether intraday lows and turnover stabilize
Market breadth Whether more stocks participate in a rebound
Margin balances Whether forced liquidation pressure is easing
U.S. 10-year yield and oil Whether discount-rate pressure on growth stocks moderates

Useful after readingDocument Organizer for Research MaterialKeeping filings and research notes in date order makes it easier to see why an outlook changed.3160 KRWView organizerDocument Organizer for Research Material

FAQ

Has the two-day plunge confirmed a KOSPI bear market?

No. The drawdown from the June peak is severe, but the index remained positive year to date. Trend, earnings revisions, and foreign flows need to deteriorate together before that conclusion is justified.

Why do Samsung and SK hynix move the index so much?

Their combined index weight exceeded half in the cited ETF snapshot, so a synchronized move can dominate gains or losses in other sectors.

Is buying immediately after the plunge attractive?

A rebound and further forced liquidation are both possible. Volume, foreign flows, defense of prior lows, and earnings revisions matter more than price alone.

What is the first confirmation signal?

A simultaneous stabilization in foreign cash and futures flows and in Samsung and SK hynix. Broader market participation would strengthen the evidence.

Public Sources

  • Reuters – July 28 KOSPI selloff and flows
  • Reuters – leverage and July 29 volatility
  • AP – global markets on July 29
  • RISE ETF – KOSPI constituent weights

This analysis summarizes market structure and confirmation signals from public information. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Author

stanley0216

Follow Me
Other Articles
코스피는 왜 이틀 연속 급락했나: 반도체·외국인·레버리지 수급과 향후 전망 - 01-kospi-ko-featured
Previous

코스피는 왜 이틀 연속 급락했나: 반도체·외국인·레버리지 수급과 향후 전망

미국 증시는 왜 밤새 크게 흔들렸나: FOMC·유가·국채금리·AI주의 향후 전망 - 02-us-market-ko-featured
Next

미국 증시는 왜 밤새 크게 흔들렸나: FOMC·유가·국채금리·AI주의 향후 전망

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

  • DeepSeek API Price Hike Plan: Facts and Cost Scenarios
  • 딥시크 API 가격 인상 예고: 공식 가격·비용 시나리오·대응 전략
  • Why SpaceX Stock Jumped 15.8% in One Day: How the Lockup Shock Turned Into a Relief Rally
  • Why Palantir Stock Jumped 29.5% in One Day: Q2 Earnings, AIP Demand, Guidance, and Valuation
  • 스페이스X 주가가 하루 만에 15.8% 폭등한 이유: 보호예수 충격이 반전된 과정

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archive

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026

Categories

  • 경제동향
  • 사회이슈
  • 쇼핑할인
  • 시장동향
  • 정책지원
  • 주식분석
  • 코인분석
Copyright 2026 — Nuri's Info World. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme